The Fraudulent Mueller Special Investigation

The Fraudulent Mueller Special Investigation

How can anyone investigate obstruction of justice when there is no crime?  Maybe I missed something.  But, if Comey’s testimony has an element of truth in it, we learned Donald Trump was not under investigation for anything.  President Trump was actually told this three times!  As MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews acknowledged “the Trump colluded with Russia” case is all but over.  The Comey testimony also showed Comey to be a sniveling snake who would do anything to save his job.  At the same time, he did the bidding of his establishment masters.  Accordingly the Mueller Special Investigation is a fraud!

James Comey

Think of it this way, what did Comey do when he admitted under oath the Obama administration intervened in the Hillary Clinton email server scandal?  He went public two days after Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac of an airport.  Comey went so far as to kid about how Hillary Clinton violated law.  However, he wasn’t going to recommend prosecution because she had no intent.  He went beyond his own required duties and essentially allowed Lynch and the administration off the hook.  What he did not do was resign when the administration intervened in the investigation acting like an arm of the Hillary Clinton campaign.

We could go on.  Comey also admitted leaking information to ensure the appointment of a special prosecutor even though there was no evidence of any crimes by Trump or his campaign regarding the Russian attempt to fix the 2016 election.  Nor did he resign when Trump asked him to take it easy on his friend Michael Flynn.  Or, when he asked for loyalty.  (Comey promised “honest loyalty instead).

There is no doubt Comey is unhappy over his firing.  However, he knew it was in the purview of the President to fire him.  Trump could even stop the investigation.  What Trump did was not only legal but not an obstruction of justice.  This is something Alan Dershowitz recently confirmed.

The reality is that the special investigation is less about truth and more about stopping the Trump administration agenda.  This is the resistance.  Robert Mueller’s team consists of hard core leftists, Clinton supporters and Clinton donors.  The idea that Trump will get a fair hearing from this group is rather far-fetched.  The recent leaks about investigating Trump for obstructing of justice beginning with the firing of James Comey is evidence.  Comey is Mueller’s good buddy.

The real question is not the investigation.  Instead, it is should Mueller recuse himself.  He is too close to the main witness; James Comey.  Further, should Mueller get such wide latitude?  He appears to be taking such as he is going after Jared Kushner’s private meetings to set up secret contacts with the Russians and Kushner’s financial dealing with Russians.  (Note to readers, administrations in the past have set up separate channels for meetings with foreign governments to carry on secret negotiations.  The Obama Administration did this with Iran.  There is even evidence Obama’s team met Iranians in 2008 before the election.  This is a far worse scenario than what Team Trump did after the election)!

There is one reality.  James Comey deserved to be fired for his participation in exonerating Hillary Clinton regarding her emails.  Hillary walked from a crime that would have caused any soldier a dishonorable discharge or worse.  Many go to jail for less.  Trump had every right to ask Comey to publicly announce he was not under investigation when the media and much of the Democratic establishment was accusing him of that very point.

The bad news is that if Trump fires Mueller, it will cause a firestorm.  However, the Mueller Special Investigation is fraudulent.  Accordingly to preserve law, it is time to end this investigation.  President Trump, take your hit now.  With the various leaking, much of it illegal (and this is a good time to point out that James Comey’s own leaks may be illegal as well according to noted scholar Jonathon Turley), we are witnessing the attempt to reverse the 2016 election.  This leads to my original question.  How is one charged with obstruction of justice if there is no crime?

Share This Post

One Response to "The Fraudulent Mueller Special Investigation"

  1. “”How We’ve Become Accustomed To Alarming Levels Of Crime And Destructive Behavior.”” When we start elevating men to “greatness’ as was with Comey, and now Mueller, one must step back and revisit:

    “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority.” Lord Acton

    “Despotic power is always accompanied by corruption of morality.”

    “Authority that does not exist for Liberty is not authority but force.”

    “Everybody likes to get as much power as circumstances allow, and nobody will vote for a self-denying ordinance.”

    “Absolute power demoralizes.”

    The “Defining deviancy down” was the forerunner of todays’ “Political Correctness”.

    In the early 1950s, the CIA began “Operation Mockingbird”, a large-scale program which attempted to manipulate news media for propaganda purposes. Today it is the Ben Rhodes’ “Echo Chamber”, graduates from “Bagdad Bob University”.

    Alas, media “robots”, in the flesh.

    The Operation Mockingbird” funded student and cultural organizations and magazines as front organizations. Later, in the 1970s, Carl Bernstein, of the famous Woodward/Bernstein duo, had an article published in Rolling Stone magazine in which he warned about the CIA’s penetration of the newsrooms.

    It is curious that Bernstein’s article appeared not too long after the Woodward/Bernstein Watergating of President Richard Nixon. Even with “Fake News”:

    ““If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

    And who said this???? Joseph Goebbels and he was right!

    For those that cannot shoot straight, a terrible metaphor these days,
    The Deep State and the Fourth Estate (“news”) now pontificate constantly against President Donald Trump. Gone is even any pretense of impartiality. Where is the balance now in newspapers such as the Washington Post, the New York Times or the LA Times? Sure, you can criticize the president. But a balanced newspaper would also carry reports of a positive nature.

    Harvard survey confirms the unmitigated bias with upwards of 90% negative media reporting for Trump.

    The study found that in Trump’s first 100 days in office, the tone of the news coverage of the president has been a whopping 80 percent negative to 20 percent positive.

    CNN and NBC struck a 93 percent negative tone on their Trump stories, with only 7 percent positive. CBS was third in the anti-Trump race, with a 91 to 9 ratio. And the pro-Trump Fox News? That network was 52 percent negative to 48 percent positive.

    So what does fair and balanced really mean, anyway? Even the best journalists cannot resist a cowardly play to be relevant in the sewers of a tainted free press. After all, is it the truth that counts, or…..the Nelson Ratings?

    Hamilton championed access to the “mechanics”, of a free press, while he wisely alliterated the consequences of “words and ideas” and the liability therein.

    The “real and present danger” is the corrupt Fifth Estate which is a socio-cultural reference to groupings of outlier viewpoints in contemporary society, and is most associated with bloggers, journalists, and non-mainstream media outlets.

    It was predicted by Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan,

    “”Defining deviancy down,” the catchy alliteration coined by Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D., N.Y.) is the 1990s equivalent of “permissiveness” in political rhetoric about social behavior, crime and criminal justice. The term implies that the problem is public tolerance of intolerable behavior and that the solution is resurrecting traditional standards by stepping up repression of underclass conduct.” How clever, to suggest a culture would be better served by a higher bar for morality.

    In Mueller’s case, herd (read the establishment) instincts generally override political and social morality.


Post Comment