York: In Ohio, the GOP puzzles over missing white voters

York: In Ohio, the GOP puzzles over missing white voters

By Byron York

Originally Appeared in:  The Examiner

The latest post-election question is whether Republicans were blind to the defeat headed their way because they chose to live in a cocoon in which they paid attention only to Fox News, conservative talk radio and right-wing websites. Listening to outlets that told them what they wanted to hear, the thinking goes, left them with no idea what was in store for them on Nov. 6.

Out in the field, the Republicans actually involved in the election are talking about different things. For example, in Ohio — the most hotly contested state in the entire race — Republicans are asking why a large group of voters, carefully cultivated through personal contacts and putative supporters of Mitt Romney, just didn’t show up at the polls.

In 2008, John McCain got 2,677,820 votes in Ohio. In 2012, according to a still-unofficial tally from the Ohio Secretary of State, Mitt Romney got 2,583,582. If before the election you had said to any politically involved Ohio Republican that Romney would receive fewer votes than McCain, you would have gotten a blank stare in return. “I would not have believed that,” says Alex Triantafilou, head of the Republican Party in Hamilton County, a critical swing area that includes Cincinnati. “I would have argued strongly that that was not going to be the case.”

Before the voting, Romney officials said constantly the race in Ohio would be close. It was. President Obama won Ohio by 107,259 votes out of about 5.3 million votes cast, according to the Secretary of State’s office — 50.18 percent to Romney’s 48.18 percent.

Republicans faced two big problems. The first is that a lot of black voters turned out. The second is that a lot of white voters didn’t.

In 2008, when Obama first won Ohio, blacks were about 11 percent of the electorate. (They are about 12 percent of Ohio’s population.) This time, blacks were 15 percent of the electorate. There has been no population explosion of African-Americans in those four years. Obama simply succeeded in getting more black voters to the polls than he did four years ago. Given the high level of black enthusiasm for Obama in 2008 — big turnout, 97 percent for Obama — that probably seemed impossible to most Republican strategists. It wasn’t. That four-percentage-point increase in black turnout produced about 200,000 votes, more than Obama’s winning margin in the state.

Four years ago, white voters were 83 percent of the Ohio electorate. This year they were 79 percent. There has been no implosion of the white population in Ohio in those years. There was simply lower turnout among white voters — somewhere in the 200,000 range, which is, again, more than Obama’s winning margin. (Latino voters weren’t a major factor in Ohio; they were 4 percent of the electorate in 2008 and 3 percent this time.)

To Continue Reading:  http://washingtonexaminer.com/in-ohio-the-gop-puzzles-over-missing-white-voters/article/2513293#.UKKhFORlGz7

Share This Post

One Response to "York: In Ohio, the GOP puzzles over missing white voters"

  1. so you’re saying that it was just the luck of the draw, right? pennsylvania and florida polling places had posters of obama all over the place. none of mitt and paul. no pressure there. black panthers in philly posted themselves outside the polls to what, make sure nobody stole the voting machines? yeah, right. so i guess ohio voters just thought romney had it in the bag, and their votes wouldn’t have counted anyway. that is what you’re saying, right? right.


Post Comment