Random Thoughts

Random Thoughts
MSNBC: A division of the Democratic Party

This is a piece of random thoughts where conventional wisdom is turned upside down and corrected.

Here is a thought, how many times does the left tells us how much of a failure the Bush tax cuts were?  Of course, what job growth has occurred in the Obama administration has arisen after the GOP won the House and thwarted any attempts to raise the Bush tax rates.  When you add the short term and somewhat inadequate stimulus provided by the payroll tax cut along with Fed’s easy money; you can actually make the case that failure to raise the marginal tax rates among the rich have had a marginal benefit to the economy.  It certainly hasn’t hurt.

Speaking of payroll tax cuts, can the Democrats really run on the premise that Republicans want to wreck Social Security when Obama is de-funding the Medicare and Social Security funds?  Maybe after Obama is sent home early to begin his third memoir, we can actually have a serious debate on entitlement reform.

Have you noticed how the left’s idea of free speech or for that matter, fair and balanced media essentially means no conservatives on the air?  The recent attack on Rush Limbaugh and even suggestion that the FCC take him off the air only goes to demonstrate the left is not really into free speech as much as a monopoly over speech.  Let’s face it, folks like Bill Maher, Keith Olbermann, and Ed Schultz have said far worse things about women, in particular conservative women, than Rush ever did.   A few years ago, there was big push from many lefties to keep their fellow liberals from appearing on Fox including NPR Mara Liasson.  (Ms. Liasson ignored the pressure for the simple reason, more people see her on Fox than on NPR and if anything, NPR gets a boost to have a responsible liberal appear on their behalf.)

Fox News is the bogeyman of the left but if these folks actually listen to what is actually on the network, they will find a network in which their pundits don’t always sing from the same hymnal.   O’Reilly’s recent attack on oil companies and speculators could easily been mouthed by Rachel Maddow or Ed Schultz and not far behind him on this issue is Lou Dobbs.  If anything, the only solid conservative, night in and night out, is Sean Hannity whereas Bill O’ Reilly may be right of center, he is not above playing the populist card at times.  It is not like MSNBC, where every evening, the hosts simply repeat what the previous host stated and there really isn’t much difference between Chris Matthews, Lawrence O’ Donnell, Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow.

Speaking of news, when does MSNBC do real news?  Unlike Fox or CNN, there is no real evening news program on MSNBC.  The only attempt for straight news broadcast is practiced by Brian Williams and that is on the main Network.  Beyond that, the only serious journalism practiced on NBC cable is performed on CNBC, the business network, but if you are looking for any aspect of a new program without much overt punditry, you have to turn into ether Fox or CNN.  Between 5 and 7, Fox has news and MSNBC has pundits hand out the latest Democratic or leftist talking points.  MSNBC is everything the left accuses Fox of being, a biased broadcast network doing the will of a specific political party.  MSNBC is nothing more than appendages of the Democratic Party and the left, leaving the real news to their competitors.

This is one of those dog bites man stories in which Peter Gleick was invited by the Heartland Institute to debate climate change science.  Instead, Gleick stole documents from the Heartland and then allegedly forged other documents in an effort to discredit the Midwest Institute instead of engaging in a debate.  Another black eye for” the world is going to end gang” that seems too insecure of its own data that it has to resort to forging documents to eliminate opponents from the public square.  We are told repeatedly that the science is settled and aren’t there 900 referenced studies proving this blah, blah, blah?  You would figure that it would be an easy matter to simply embarrass this upstart think tank out of the Midwest or can we conclude that many within the climatology community are not so certain of their data?  If nothing else, like the attempt to silence Rush, there is an attempt to silence one side of this debate.

The Koch Brothers - funders of Heartland

The big story in all of this was how little money Heartland received from evil energy producers and how much money many of these evil energy producers contributed to many of the Green organizations like the Sierra Club.  As for the Koch Brothers’ contribution to Heartland Institute it was to further Heartland Institute’s free market ideas on health care!  The conventional wisdom is that Heartland and others are massively funded by big business but the reality is the complete opposite, it is the green movement getting all the dough.  Sierra Club collected more money from the Natural gas business than what Heartland’s budget was for all of its projects over a four year period!

Eric Holder’s squashing Texas Voter ID law is not about helping minorities but for Obama and the Democrats having an issue to use in the minority communities with the tag line, “evil Republicans want to take your voting rights away.”  Meanwhile, evil Democrats in Rhode Island are obviously denying legitimate voters in their states their rights with the voter ID laws.   Oh well, I can’t wait for Holder to investigate Rhode Island Democrats who voted for voter ID’S in their state but then Hell will be freezing over before that actually happen.

Dumbo Harding's economic policies fared better than genius Obama's

One last point, Warren G Harding is considered one of the dumbest President but he inherited as bad an economic situation as Reagan did in 1980 or Obama in 2008.  Within two years, Harding’s policies had the economy growing stronger but Obama’s recovery is still sputtering at best and has produced the slowest economic revival in the post-World War II era.  So can we conclude that maybe Harding wasn’t as dumb as we thought and maybe Obama’s not as smart as we thought?

[amazon_carousel widget_type=”Bestsellers” width=”450″ height=”200″ title=”” market_place=”US” shuffle_products=”False” show_border=”False” browse_node=”” search_index=”Books” /]

Share This Post

One Response to "Random Thoughts"

  1. >>Here is a thought, how many times does the left tells us how much of a failure the Bush tax cuts were?

    I dunno, maybe a trillion? That’s how much deeper in debt we are as a result of them.

    >>Of course, what job growth has occurred in the Obama administration has arisen after the GOP won the House and thwarted any attempts to raise the Bush tax rates.

    Un-fucking-believable. You guys spend the last three years BLAMING Obama for the slow job growth, and now that it’s picking up, YOU want to take credit for it. And why? Because you’ve stopped him from raising the Bush tax rates? Seriously, that’s how jobs are created, when taxes on the rich are prevented from rising? Okay, I’ll bite: Why, then, didn’t they grow when the tax CUTS went into effect, and why, all of a sudden, after them NOT rising for the last 11 years, is their magical effect just NOW kicking in?

    Take your time.

    >>When you add the short term and somewhat inadequate stimulus provided by the payroll tax cut along with Fed’s easy money; you can actually make the case that failure to raise the marginal tax rates among the rich have had a marginal benefit to the economy.

    You can’t. You really can’t. You can make the case that the STIMULUS helped the economy. Actually, good luck making the case that it DIDN’T.

    http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2012/02/stimulus_three_years.html

    >>Speaking of payroll tax cuts, can the Democrats really run on the premise that Republicans want to wreck Social Security when Obama is de-funding the Medicare and Social Security funds?

    He isn’t, but again, make up your minds. Don’t you guys hate those “nanny state” social safety net programs like that? If he’s really de-funding them, why aren’t you cheering him on?

    >>Have you noticed how the left’s idea of free speech or for that matter, fair and balanced media essentially means no conservatives on the air?

    Oh my God, you’re fucking kidding, right? Please tell me you’re kidding.

    >>The recent attack on Rush Limbaugh and even suggestion that the FCC take him off the air only goes to demonstrate the left is not really into free speech as much as a monopoly over speech.

    Who has suggested that he be taken off the air? He’s been denounced for some awful and slanderous things he said about a private citizen, and some sponsors got so disgusted that they pulled their advertising, as is their right to do. Who in the world is trying to prohibit his right to say his horrible shit?

    >>Let’s face it, folks like Bill Maher, Keith Olbermann, and Ed Schultz have said far worse things about women, in particular conservative women, than Rush ever did.

    Oh, yawn. Yes, Ed Schultz once called Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut” (i.e., not referencing her actual sexuality, it was a turn of phrase), so because that contained the word “slut”, that’s just as bad as what Rush did, which is completely LIE for three straight days about what this woman, a private citizen, said in her testimony, and then slam her as a slut and a whore and demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of birth control in order to paint her as a nymphomaniac since grade school. Not to mention the previous three decades of equally awful crap he’s been spewing for four hours, nationwide, every goddamn day…not to mention the equally awful crap that Bill O’Reilly and all the other Fox News hosts spew all day, every day, on their very own network, or what “Morning Joe” spews every day, four hours day, on MSNBC, for Crissake…

    And your response to this, naturally, is that liberals want all the conservatives off the air.

    You have no idea what you’re talking about.

    >>It is not like MSNBC, where every evening, the hosts simply repeat what the previous host stated and there really isn’t much difference between Chris Matthews, Lawrence O’ Donnell, Ed Schultz and Rachel Maddow.

    Don’t pretend you ever watched any of those shows. Just don’t. Spare us.

    >>Speaking of news, when does MSNBC do real news? Unlike Fox or CNN, there is no real evening news program on MSNBC. The only attempt for straight news broadcast is practiced by Brian Williams and that is on the main Network.

    Oh yes, the “real news” of Fox. Again: Spare us.

    >>MSNBC is everything the left accuses Fox of being, a biased broadcast network doing the will of a specific political party.

    Right, yes. Fox is unbiased, serious journalism, and MSNBC is just pure leftist propaganda, 24/7. Damn that four hours of “Morning Joe” and its leftist agenda!

    >>We are told repeatedly that the science is settled and aren’t there 900 referenced studies proving this blah, blah, blah? You would figure that it would be an easy matter to simply embarrass this upstart think tank out of the Midwest or can we conclude that many within the climatology community are not so certain of their data?

    “Blah, blah, blah”? There ARE 900+ peer-reviewed studies backing up the global warming argument. So because this one guy used a false name to get these documents, that undermines all that? Fine. Then all the scams Andrew Breitbart and his sleaze-bucket protege O’Keefe got caught at destroy all your arguments against ACORN and everyone else THEY tried to undermine. Happy now?

    >>Eric Holder’s squashing Texas Voter ID law is not about helping minorities but for Obama and the Democrats having an issue to use in the minority communities with the tag line, “evil Republicans want to take your voting rights away.” Meanwhile, evil Democrats in Rhode Island are obviously denying legitimate voters in their states their rights with the voter ID laws.

    Look, AGAIN, you gotta make up your mind. Either you’re FOR Voter ID laws, in which case, you can’t really gripe about the Rhode Island one, or you’re against them, in which case, you can’t really gripe about liberals gripes about them. Plenty of us are not happy about the Rhode Island law. Clearly, not all Democrats march in lockstep. So? Should we?

    >>So can we conclude that maybe Harding wasn’t as dumb as we thought and maybe Obama’s not as smart as we thought?

    Tell you what: I’ll concede that Harding’s reputation, due mostly to the scandals that plagued his administration deserves to be higher than it is if you’ll concede that by and large, you guys decided that Obama was “the Worst President Ever” from day one, no matter what he was going to do, no matter what he accomplished, no matter how much the economy improved or anything else, because the only thing that matters to you guys is winning back the White House, and that because he’s actually been far more moderate than you expected and far more competent than you gave him credit for, you’ve resorted out of desperation to attacking idiotic crap like his use of a Teleprompter, or how many times he said “I” in the speech after bin Laden was killed, or whether or not his birth certificate is a phony.

    Deal?

    Reply

Post Comment